<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 235 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75169</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, granted the applicants a waiver of predeposit of service tax amounting to Rs. 3,31,500, along with interest and penalty under Sections 78 and 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. This decision was based on the applicants&#039; strong argument that despite receiving payment in Indian currency for services provided to a customer in Mauritius, they should be entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 21/2003-S.T. The Tribunal relied on a previous case precedent to support the applicants&#039; claim and emphasized that the discrepancy in payment currency was not due to the applicants&#039; actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 235 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75169</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, granted the applicants a waiver of predeposit of service tax amounting to Rs. 3,31,500, along with interest and penalty under Sections 78 and 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. This decision was based on the applicants&#039; strong argument that despite receiving payment in Indian currency for services provided to a customer in Mauritius, they should be entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 21/2003-S.T. The Tribunal relied on a previous case precedent to support the applicants&#039; claim and emphasized that the discrepancy in payment currency was not due to the applicants&#039; actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>