<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 269 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75162</link>
    <description>Under F.O.R. supply contracts, freight and insurance incurred for delivery to the customer&#039;s premises are excluded from assessable value because that location is not the place of removal. The valuation applicable at the relevant time therefore required duty to be recomputed on the correct assessable value without those delivery-related charges. Refund and credit consequences had to follow the revised duty computation, limited to duty properly payable after excluding freight and insurance. The analysis relies on settled valuation principles and Supreme Court precedent treating such transport and insurance charges as non-includible where they relate to delivery beyond the place of removal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 269 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75162</link>
      <description>Under F.O.R. supply contracts, freight and insurance incurred for delivery to the customer&#039;s premises are excluded from assessable value because that location is not the place of removal. The valuation applicable at the relevant time therefore required duty to be recomputed on the correct assessable value without those delivery-related charges. Refund and credit consequences had to follow the revised duty computation, limited to duty properly payable after excluding freight and insurance. The analysis relies on settled valuation principles and Supreme Court precedent treating such transport and insurance charges as non-includible where they relate to delivery beyond the place of removal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>