https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75158 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi allowed the party's cross-objection and rejected the Department's appeal in a dispute over duty demand and penalty imposition. The Tribunal found that issuing a notice invoking the extended period under Section 11A after withdrawing an earlier notice was unwarranted. It concluded that there was no suppression of facts by the party to justify invoking the extended period of limitation, leading to the rejection of the Department's appeal and granting relief to the party. en-us Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75158 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi allowed the party's cross-objection and rejected the Department's appeal in a dispute over duty demand and penalty imposition. The Tribunal found that issuing a notice invoking the extended period under Section 11A after withdrawing an earlier notice was unwarranted. It concluded that there was no suppression of facts by the party to justify invoking the extended period of limitation, leading to the rejection of the Department's appeal and granting relief to the party. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75158