<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 213 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75135</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reduced penalties imposed on the Appellants under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, due to lack of sufficient evidence for habitual offenses and disproportionate penalties. Penalties for M/s. Sun Informatics were revised to Rs. 5 lakhs, Shri R.C. Khurana to Rs. 10 lakhs, Shri Gaurav Khurana to Rs. 5 lakhs, and Shri S.B. Maheshwari to Rs. 10,000. The confiscation of goods and penalties were upheld, except for the reduction in penalty amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 213 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75135</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reduced penalties imposed on the Appellants under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, due to lack of sufficient evidence for habitual offenses and disproportionate penalties. Penalties for M/s. Sun Informatics were revised to Rs. 5 lakhs, Shri R.C. Khurana to Rs. 10 lakhs, Shri Gaurav Khurana to Rs. 5 lakhs, and Shri S.B. Maheshwari to Rs. 10,000. The confiscation of goods and penalties were upheld, except for the reduction in penalty amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>