<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 208 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75128</link>
    <description>A later binding departmental circular clarified that developers, builders and promoters are not liable to service tax under Construction of Residential Complex Services. Because the original adjudicating authority did not consider that clarification, the controversy required fresh examination on de novo adjudication. The Tribunal therefore remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration in light of the clarified legal position, with the demand and pre-deposit challenge to be reassessed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 208 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75128</link>
      <description>A later binding departmental circular clarified that developers, builders and promoters are not liable to service tax under Construction of Residential Complex Services. Because the original adjudicating authority did not consider that clarification, the controversy required fresh examination on de novo adjudication. The Tribunal therefore remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration in light of the clarified legal position, with the demand and pre-deposit challenge to be reassessed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>