<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 202 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75123</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit was declined for the confirmed service tax demand and interest because no prima facie case was made out, while waiver was granted for the penalty amount. Recovery of the tax and interest was stayed, subject to deposit being made within eight weeks. The matter thus turned on partial relief at the interim stage, preserving the demand for tax and interest but relieving the appellant from pre-deposit of penalty pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 202 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75123</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit was declined for the confirmed service tax demand and interest because no prima facie case was made out, while waiver was granted for the penalty amount. Recovery of the tax and interest was stayed, subject to deposit being made within eight weeks. The matter thus turned on partial relief at the interim stage, preserving the demand for tax and interest but relieving the appellant from pre-deposit of penalty pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>