<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 199 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75116</link>
    <description>At the interim stage, the applicant was not able to substantiate the alleged use of the disputed services, so no strong prima facie case for full waiver of pre-deposit was made out. The CESTAT therefore granted only a partial waiver of the pre-deposit demanded towards service tax, interest and penalty under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and stayed recovery of the balance during pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 199 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75116</link>
      <description>At the interim stage, the applicant was not able to substantiate the alleged use of the disputed services, so no strong prima facie case for full waiver of pre-deposit was made out. The CESTAT therefore granted only a partial waiver of the pre-deposit demanded towards service tax, interest and penalty under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and stayed recovery of the balance during pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>