<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 432 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75109</link>
    <description>Conditional customs exemption imports do not become prohibited goods merely because exemption conditions are breached; they become dutiable and may be subject to customs adjudication. Fraud or suppression requires evidentiary proof, and fraud, if established, makes a contract voidable rather than void from inception. Refund and quantification claims involving contested facts, material values, dismantling, and party conduct require evidence and are unsuitable for writ determination. The arbitration agreement remains independent of the underlying contract under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, so allegations that the contract is void do not invalidate the arbitration clause; remaining disputes must proceed to arbitration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 432 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75109</link>
      <description>Conditional customs exemption imports do not become prohibited goods merely because exemption conditions are breached; they become dutiable and may be subject to customs adjudication. Fraud or suppression requires evidentiary proof, and fraud, if established, makes a contract voidable rather than void from inception. Refund and quantification claims involving contested facts, material values, dismantling, and party conduct require evidence and are unsuitable for writ determination. The arbitration agreement remains independent of the underlying contract under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, so allegations that the contract is void do not invalidate the arbitration clause; remaining disputes must proceed to arbitration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>