<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 384 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75106</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the appellants are liable to pay interest under Section 11AB on the erroneously sanctioned rebate. The action of the lower authority in adjusting the interest from the amount due to the appellant was deemed legally correct under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act. The appeal was dismissed, and the impugned order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 384 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75106</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the appellants are liable to pay interest under Section 11AB on the erroneously sanctioned rebate. The action of the lower authority in adjusting the interest from the amount due to the appellant was deemed legally correct under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act. The appeal was dismissed, and the impugned order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>