<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 300 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75081</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of on 23-7-02, and an order was passed on 7-10-08, which was deemed unwarranted as no appeal was pending. The registry was directed to monitor the system to prevent such errors in the future. The Misc. application was disposed of with this observation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 300 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75081</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of on 23-7-02, and an order was passed on 7-10-08, which was deemed unwarranted as no appeal was pending. The registry was directed to monitor the system to prevent such errors in the future. The Misc. application was disposed of with this observation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>