<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 297 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75078</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the services provided by the appellant, a chartered accountancy firm, constituted information technology services exempt from service tax. It ruled in favor of the appellant, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s classification of the services as business auxiliary services. The Tribunal also found the invocation of the extended period of limitation unjustified and set aside the imposed penalties, as the appellant had a genuine belief in the non-taxability of their services until a certain date. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was overturned, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 297 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75078</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the services provided by the appellant, a chartered accountancy firm, constituted information technology services exempt from service tax. It ruled in favor of the appellant, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s classification of the services as business auxiliary services. The Tribunal also found the invocation of the extended period of limitation unjustified and set aside the imposed penalties, as the appellant had a genuine belief in the non-taxability of their services until a certain date. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was overturned, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>