<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 177 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75073</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, ruling in favor of the respondent in the case concerning the classification of services for service tax liability. The Tribunal determined that the services provided by the respondent fell under technical inspection and certification services as notified in the statute, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision was based on an examination of the nature of services provided and relevant legal precedents, including CBEC circulars and Tribunal decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 177 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75073</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, ruling in favor of the respondent in the case concerning the classification of services for service tax liability. The Tribunal determined that the services provided by the respondent fell under technical inspection and certification services as notified in the statute, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision was based on an examination of the nature of services provided and relevant legal precedents, including CBEC circulars and Tribunal decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>