<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 170 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75069</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the department challenging the grant of refunds to the respondent were allowed by the Tribunal. The lower appellate authority&#039;s decision to grant refunds was set aside. The original authority&#039;s rejection of refund claims was remanded for proper examination of the limitation issue. The Tribunal directed the original authority to reexamine the original documents and verify if the services were used in manufacturing or clearing export goods. The department&#039;s appeals were upheld, and the original authority was instructed to dispose of the refund claims within three months, adhering to legal principles and ensuring a fair hearing for the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 170 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75069</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the department challenging the grant of refunds to the respondent were allowed by the Tribunal. The lower appellate authority&#039;s decision to grant refunds was set aside. The original authority&#039;s rejection of refund claims was remanded for proper examination of the limitation issue. The Tribunal directed the original authority to reexamine the original documents and verify if the services were used in manufacturing or clearing export goods. The department&#039;s appeals were upheld, and the original authority was instructed to dispose of the refund claims within three months, adhering to legal principles and ensuring a fair hearing for the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>