<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 172 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75068</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to set aside penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 based on justifiable cause shown by the respondents under Section 80. However, the Tribunal overturned the decision to set aside interest liability, holding the respondents accountable for not fulfilling their service tax obligations. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partially successful, with penalties upheld and interest reinstated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 18:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 172 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75068</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to set aside penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 based on justifiable cause shown by the respondents under Section 80. However, the Tribunal overturned the decision to set aside interest liability, holding the respondents accountable for not fulfilling their service tax obligations. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partially successful, with penalties upheld and interest reinstated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>