<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 168 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75065</link>
    <description>In a stay application concerning service tax demands on clearing and forwarding, repacking, warehousing, and loading or unloading charges, the tribunal found the dispute arguable and suitable for detailed consideration. For interim relief, it directed the appellants to deposit 20% of the service tax demanded under the pre-deposit regime, and stayed recovery of the balance of tax, interest, and penalties until the appeal is decided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 168 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75065</link>
      <description>In a stay application concerning service tax demands on clearing and forwarding, repacking, warehousing, and loading or unloading charges, the tribunal found the dispute arguable and suitable for detailed consideration. For interim relief, it directed the appellants to deposit 20% of the service tax demanded under the pre-deposit regime, and stayed recovery of the balance of tax, interest, and penalties until the appeal is decided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>