<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 92 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75058</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order directing duty deposit while waiving penalty. The court held that the petition under Article 226 was maintainable despite the availability of an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act. It clarified that the Tribunal&#039;s order was not perverse, and the Tribunal had not exceeded its jurisdiction. The court emphasized refraining from preempting the Tribunal&#039;s decision by making observations on the issues raised in the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 92 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75058</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order directing duty deposit while waiving penalty. The court held that the petition under Article 226 was maintainable despite the availability of an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act. It clarified that the Tribunal&#039;s order was not perverse, and the Tribunal had not exceeded its jurisdiction. The court emphasized refraining from preempting the Tribunal&#039;s decision by making observations on the issues raised in the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>