<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 152 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75042</link>
    <description>The Tribunal denied the application for waiver of pre-deposit of service tax amounting to Rs. 1,96,09,018, interest, and penalty under the Finance Act, 1994. The applicants&#039; services were classified as &quot;Video Tape Production Services&quot; due to providing post-production services like graphics and special effects. Their claim of &quot;Export of Services&quot; was dismissed as services were not performed outside India. The limitation on demand was upheld as the department discovered non-payment during an official visit. The financial hardship plea was rejected, leading to a directive for a partial pre-deposit within eight weeks, with the remaining amount deferred during the appeal. Compliance by 11-8-2009 was emphasized to avoid dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 152 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75042</link>
      <description>The Tribunal denied the application for waiver of pre-deposit of service tax amounting to Rs. 1,96,09,018, interest, and penalty under the Finance Act, 1994. The applicants&#039; services were classified as &quot;Video Tape Production Services&quot; due to providing post-production services like graphics and special effects. Their claim of &quot;Export of Services&quot; was dismissed as services were not performed outside India. The limitation on demand was upheld as the department discovered non-payment during an official visit. The financial hardship plea was rejected, leading to a directive for a partial pre-deposit within eight weeks, with the remaining amount deferred during the appeal. Compliance by 11-8-2009 was emphasized to avoid dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>