<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 195 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75036</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the penalty imposition under Section 78 in a case involving Business Auxiliary Service, allowing the appellants to contest it in de novo proceedings. The Tribunal granted the benefit of Notification No. 25/2004-ST for re-quantifying the duty amount and considered a previous decision for consistency in interpreting tax laws. The judgment ensured the correct application of legal provisions and notifications while providing the appellants with the opportunity to challenge the penalty in subsequent proceedings before the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 13:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 195 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75036</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the penalty imposition under Section 78 in a case involving Business Auxiliary Service, allowing the appellants to contest it in de novo proceedings. The Tribunal granted the benefit of Notification No. 25/2004-ST for re-quantifying the duty amount and considered a previous decision for consistency in interpreting tax laws. The judgment ensured the correct application of legal provisions and notifications while providing the appellants with the opportunity to challenge the penalty in subsequent proceedings before the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>