<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 369 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75027</link>
    <description>The appeal by M/s. Vivekanand Medical Research Society for exemption under Notification No. 64/88-Cus was unsuccessful. Non-compliance led to confiscation of goods, a duty demand of Rs. 10,88,916/-, and a penalty of Rs. 20,000/-. The cancellation of CDEC certificates due to record-keeping failures impacted their entitlement to the exemption. Alternative pleas for exemption under other notifications were also rejected. The judgment emphasized the continuous obligation to meet conditions and submit necessary certificates for claiming exemptions, ultimately upholding the confiscation, duty payment, and penalties imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 369 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75027</link>
      <description>The appeal by M/s. Vivekanand Medical Research Society for exemption under Notification No. 64/88-Cus was unsuccessful. Non-compliance led to confiscation of goods, a duty demand of Rs. 10,88,916/-, and a penalty of Rs. 20,000/-. The cancellation of CDEC certificates due to record-keeping failures impacted their entitlement to the exemption. Alternative pleas for exemption under other notifications were also rejected. The judgment emphasized the continuous obligation to meet conditions and submit necessary certificates for claiming exemptions, ultimately upholding the confiscation, duty payment, and penalties imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>