<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (5) TMI 188 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74996</link>
    <description>An actual user may seek direct import of carbon steel re-rollable scrap under the Import Export Policy when the canalising agency does not arrange supply within the stipulated period and adequate indigenous supply is not made. The Court treated the policy as intended to ensure raw material availability for industrial production, and found that the petitioners had followed the prescribed channel, repeatedly sought supply, and received only a small part of the assessed requirement. As indigenous arrangements were not shown to have been made within the policy period, relief was granted, subject to proportional adjustment for limited foreign exchange availability, rather than a total denial of the import facility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (5) TMI 188 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74996</link>
      <description>An actual user may seek direct import of carbon steel re-rollable scrap under the Import Export Policy when the canalising agency does not arrange supply within the stipulated period and adequate indigenous supply is not made. The Court treated the policy as intended to ensure raw material availability for industrial production, and found that the petitioners had followed the prescribed channel, repeatedly sought supply, and received only a small part of the assessed requirement. As indigenous arrangements were not shown to have been made within the policy period, relief was granted, subject to proportional adjustment for limited foreign exchange availability, rather than a total denial of the import facility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>