<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 213 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74984</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, highlighting the distinction between an adjudicating authority and a reviewing authority under the Central Excise Act. It held that the appeal was not maintainable as the Collector&#039;s order was passed as a reviewing authority, and the Board could not review such orders under Section 35E(1) of the Act. The Tribunal emphasized that the Board&#039;s review jurisdiction is limited to orders passed by the Collector as an adjudicating authority, not a revising authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:33:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 213 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74984</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, highlighting the distinction between an adjudicating authority and a reviewing authority under the Central Excise Act. It held that the appeal was not maintainable as the Collector&#039;s order was passed as a reviewing authority, and the Board could not review such orders under Section 35E(1) of the Act. The Tribunal emphasized that the Board&#039;s review jurisdiction is limited to orders passed by the Collector as an adjudicating authority, not a revising authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>