<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (8) TMI 179 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74969</link>
    <description>Additional evidence cannot be admitted on appeal to build a fresh case not founded in the show cause notice, especially where the documents were neither relied upon nor adjudicated below. The appellate process cannot be used to fill gaps in the Revenue&#039;s case or to introduce an extraneous issue that would deprive the other side of an opportunity to meet the allegation at the original stage. The application to produce the documents was therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:45:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (8) TMI 179 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74969</link>
      <description>Additional evidence cannot be admitted on appeal to build a fresh case not founded in the show cause notice, especially where the documents were neither relied upon nor adjudicated below. The appellate process cannot be used to fill gaps in the Revenue&#039;s case or to introduce an extraneous issue that would deprive the other side of an opportunity to meet the allegation at the original stage. The application to produce the documents was therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>