https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74966 An administrative authority cannot dilute a subsisting judicial direction by substituting a different import policy for the one expressly ordered by the Court. Where an earlier writ order required issue of an export house certificate under the AM-79 policy and conferred entitlement to the facilities under that scheme, the authority could not neutralise that direction by issuing notice and altering the licence under the later AM-83 policy. Any difficulty in implementing the court's order had to be placed before the Court or pursued in appeal. The show-cause notice and consequential order were quashed and set aside, and the petitioner succeeded. en-us Thu, 10 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:33:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74966 An administrative authority cannot dilute a subsisting judicial direction by substituting a different import policy for the one expressly ordered by the Court. Where an earlier writ order required issue of an export house certificate under the AM-79 policy and conferred entitlement to the facilities under that scheme, the authority could not neutralise that direction by issuing notice and altering the licence under the later AM-83 policy. Any difficulty in implementing the court's order had to be placed before the Court or pursued in appeal. The show-cause notice and consequential order were quashed and set aside, and the petitioner succeeded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74966