<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (8) TMI 174 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74964</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the foot rest is an essential part of the scooter, directing its value to be included in the assessable value. This decision was based on common trade understanding, disregarding conflicting regulations and letters. The inclusion was limited to actual clearances made by the appellants, not the total production volume. The appeal was mostly dismissed, except for this adjustment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:27:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (8) TMI 174 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74964</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the foot rest is an essential part of the scooter, directing its value to be included in the assessable value. This decision was based on common trade understanding, disregarding conflicting regulations and letters. The inclusion was limited to actual clearances made by the appellants, not the total production volume. The appeal was mostly dismissed, except for this adjustment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>