<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (8) TMI 170 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74960</link>
    <description>Deductibility of freight, packing, discounts, commission, banking charges and export-clearance items for exemption under Notification No. 176/77 depended on reliable proof, and the claimed deductions were disallowed because the invoices and accounts did not satisfactorily establish the components or show that trade discounts were uniformly available to the trade. The limitation plea also failed because the notice proceeded on removal of excisable goods without payment of duty and operation without a licence, not on short levy under the relevant short-levy provisions. The duty demand was therefore upheld and no relief was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:21:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (8) TMI 170 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74960</link>
      <description>Deductibility of freight, packing, discounts, commission, banking charges and export-clearance items for exemption under Notification No. 176/77 depended on reliable proof, and the claimed deductions were disallowed because the invoices and accounts did not satisfactorily establish the components or show that trade discounts were uniformly available to the trade. The limitation plea also failed because the notice proceeded on removal of excisable goods without payment of duty and operation without a licence, not on short levy under the relevant short-levy provisions. The duty demand was therefore upheld and no relief was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>