<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 238 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74958</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that carbide sludge cannot be classified as &#039;manufactured goods&#039; and is not excisable. The appeals filed by the assessees were allowed with consequential relief, while the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The extended period of limitation for excise duty demand was found not applicable due to lack of suppression or misrepresentation by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:10:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 238 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74958</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that carbide sludge cannot be classified as &#039;manufactured goods&#039; and is not excisable. The appeals filed by the assessees were allowed with consequential relief, while the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The extended period of limitation for excise duty demand was found not applicable due to lack of suppression or misrepresentation by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>