<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 234 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74954</link>
    <description>The expression &quot;terminal&quot; in Notification No. 186/87-Cus. was construed by reference to technical dictionaries and departmental clarification. An intelligent terminal was treated as a terminal even though it had local processing capability, because the notification used the broader phrase &quot;graphic display terminal&quot; and did not distinguish between dumb and intelligent terminals. The discussion also noted that Customs authorities should act consistently with the Department of Electronics clarification describing the imported equipment as a terminal to the programmable logic controller. On that basis, the imported colour graphic display terminal fell within Serial No. 8 and qualified for exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:54:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 234 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74954</link>
      <description>The expression &quot;terminal&quot; in Notification No. 186/87-Cus. was construed by reference to technical dictionaries and departmental clarification. An intelligent terminal was treated as a terminal even though it had local processing capability, because the notification used the broader phrase &quot;graphic display terminal&quot; and did not distinguish between dumb and intelligent terminals. The discussion also noted that Customs authorities should act consistently with the Department of Electronics clarification describing the imported equipment as a terminal to the programmable logic controller. On that basis, the imported colour graphic display terminal fell within Serial No. 8 and qualified for exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>