https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74949 The show-cause notice and debarment under Clause 7(1)(d) and (e) of the Exports (Control) Order, 1977 could not stand because the record did not establish that the exporter was solely responsible for the contamination of the frozen shrimp consignment. The cargo had been cleared for export after inspection, contamination was detected only in part of the shipment at destination, and transhipment or carrier custody provided a plausible alternative source. The material also failed to show any intentional, repeated, or dishonest conduct amounting to corrupt or fraudulent practice in export or commercial dealings. On those facts, the notice and debarment order were quashed. en-us Tue, 11 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74949 The show-cause notice and debarment under Clause 7(1)(d) and (e) of the Exports (Control) Order, 1977 could not stand because the record did not establish that the exporter was solely responsible for the contamination of the frozen shrimp consignment. The cargo had been cleared for export after inspection, contamination was detected only in part of the shipment at destination, and transhipment or carrier custody provided a plausible alternative source. The material also failed to show any intentional, repeated, or dishonest conduct amounting to corrupt or fraudulent practice in export or commercial dealings. On those facts, the notice and debarment order were quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74949