<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 223 - CEGAT, N. DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74943</link>
    <description>Continuous, evidenced protest can preserve a refund claim from limitation even without a protest endorsement on every gate pass: written objections, licence applications renewed under protest, and PLA deposits marked under protest were sufficient, so the refund claim was not time-barred. Ayurvedic medicines also could not be placed in the residuary excise entry where a preceding tariff item excluded medicines exclusively Ayurvedic, Unani, Sidha or Homoeopathic; goods specifically referred to in an earlier item, even by exclusion, do not fall within the residuary entry. The assessee succeeded on both limitation and classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:22:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 223 - CEGAT, N. DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74943</link>
      <description>Continuous, evidenced protest can preserve a refund claim from limitation even without a protest endorsement on every gate pass: written objections, licence applications renewed under protest, and PLA deposits marked under protest were sufficient, so the refund claim was not time-barred. Ayurvedic medicines also could not be placed in the residuary excise entry where a preceding tariff item excluded medicines exclusively Ayurvedic, Unani, Sidha or Homoeopathic; goods specifically referred to in an earlier item, even by exclusion, do not fall within the residuary entry. The assessee succeeded on both limitation and classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>