<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (6) TMI 180 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74935</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the admission of additional evidence but accepted technical literature on malt products. The impugned product was classified under Heading 19.01 of the Central Excise Tariff as a food preparation, not merely a dairy produce. The Tribunal emphasized the specific facts of the case for classification decisions, dismissing claims based on general legal principles. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower authorities&#039; classification under Heading 19.01.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:56:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (6) TMI 180 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74935</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the admission of additional evidence but accepted technical literature on malt products. The impugned product was classified under Heading 19.01 of the Central Excise Tariff as a food preparation, not merely a dairy produce. The Tribunal emphasized the specific facts of the case for classification decisions, dismissing claims based on general legal principles. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower authorities&#039; classification under Heading 19.01.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>