<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (6) TMI 176 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74931</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions, determining that the rate of duty applicable was based on the date of filing the into-bond bill of entry, not the date of removal. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the legality of the demand notice and subsequent orders, as well as the calculation of interest under Section 72(1)(b) of the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:39:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (6) TMI 176 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74931</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions, determining that the rate of duty applicable was based on the date of filing the into-bond bill of entry, not the date of removal. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the legality of the demand notice and subsequent orders, as well as the calculation of interest under Section 72(1)(b) of the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>