<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 279 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74903</link>
    <description>Pending excise proceedings for non-levy or short-levy stood transferred to the Collector of Central Excise under the 1985 amendment, so adjudication by the Assistant Collector after the transfer was without jurisdiction. An adjudication made by a forum lacking jurisdiction was ab initio void and non est, creating no legal consequence. Because such a void order did not attract res judicata, the competent authority could proceed to adjudicate the matter afresh.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:14:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 279 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74903</link>
      <description>Pending excise proceedings for non-levy or short-levy stood transferred to the Collector of Central Excise under the 1985 amendment, so adjudication by the Assistant Collector after the transfer was without jurisdiction. An adjudication made by a forum lacking jurisdiction was ab initio void and non est, creating no legal consequence. Because such a void order did not attract res judicata, the competent authority could proceed to adjudicate the matter afresh.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>