<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (10) TMI 224 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74885</link>
    <description>Pack sheets used as normal minimum packing for jute manufactures exported under bond were treated as incidental or ancillary to the completion and delivery of the goods, rather than as having a separate excisable identity. On that basis, the packing material was regarded as part of the exported product and did not attract independent central excise duty. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to the refund relief failed, and the duty demand on the pack sheets was set aside in substance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:17:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (10) TMI 224 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74885</link>
      <description>Pack sheets used as normal minimum packing for jute manufactures exported under bond were treated as incidental or ancillary to the completion and delivery of the goods, rather than as having a separate excisable identity. On that basis, the packing material was regarded as part of the exported product and did not attract independent central excise duty. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to the refund relief failed, and the duty demand on the pack sheets was set aside in substance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>