<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 371 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74877</link>
    <description>Concessional duty under Notification No. 43/81 was available even where matches were cleared in boxes containing fewer than 50 matches, because the reference to gross boxes of 50 matches each identified the basis of the exemption rather than imposing a strict condition that every box must contain exactly 50 matches. A restrictive construction denying the benefit on that ground was unwarranted, though the concession could be denied if the number of matches exceeded 50 per box. The denial of the exemption was therefore incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:02:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 371 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74877</link>
      <description>Concessional duty under Notification No. 43/81 was available even where matches were cleared in boxes containing fewer than 50 matches, because the reference to gross boxes of 50 matches each identified the basis of the exemption rather than imposing a strict condition that every box must contain exactly 50 matches. A restrictive construction denying the benefit on that ground was unwarranted, though the concession could be denied if the number of matches exceeded 50 per box. The denial of the exemption was therefore incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>