<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (11) TMI 281 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74874</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Collector&#039;s order and remanding the case for readjudication. The duty demand needed to be properly quantified based on average values, and the penalty amount required reassessment considering the reduced duty demand. The extent of penalty reduction was left to be determined during the readjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:56:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (11) TMI 281 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74874</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Collector&#039;s order and remanding the case for readjudication. The duty demand needed to be properly quantified based on average values, and the penalty amount required reassessment considering the reduced duty demand. The extent of penalty reduction was left to be determined during the readjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>