<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (2) TMI 389 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74847</link>
    <description>Blended yarn of the specified composition was treated as falling under the residuary tariff entry because it did not fit the specific classifications in Item 18(III)(ii) or Item 18E of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The same composition-based reasoning had been applied in an earlier batch involving the same assessee, and that approach was followed again here. The practical effect was that duty had to be recomputed on the basis of Item 68, with recovery confined to the reassessed amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 13:32:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (2) TMI 389 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74847</link>
      <description>Blended yarn of the specified composition was treated as falling under the residuary tariff entry because it did not fit the specific classifications in Item 18(III)(ii) or Item 18E of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The same composition-based reasoning had been applied in an earlier batch involving the same assessee, and that approach was followed again here. The practical effect was that duty had to be recomputed on the basis of Item 68, with recovery confined to the reassessed amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>