https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74840 Property produced before a criminal court remains in custodia legis for safe keeping and further orders under Section 51 CrPC, but that custody does not eliminate another statutory authority's powers under its own enactment. The court retained control over the gold articles by directing production before the Sessions Court Registrar, while the Gold Control authorities were permitted to seek court approval for testing, weighing and other necessary operations under the Gold Control law. The arrangement preserved judicial custody of the property and allowed regulated enforcement action without displacing the Sessions Court's control over the seized articles. en-us Tue, 02 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74840 Property produced before a criminal court remains in custodia legis for safe keeping and further orders under Section 51 CrPC, but that custody does not eliminate another statutory authority's powers under its own enactment. The court retained control over the gold articles by directing production before the Sessions Court Registrar, while the Gold Control authorities were permitted to seek court approval for testing, weighing and other necessary operations under the Gold Control law. The arrangement preserved judicial custody of the property and allowed regulated enforcement action without displacing the Sessions Court's control over the seized articles. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 02 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74840