<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 199 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74831</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the imported goods were correctly classified under Item 68 CET. The decision granted relief to the appellants, emphasizing that the dispute concerned the levy of additional duty rather than classification under the Customs Tariff Schedule. The Tribunal disregarded the relevance of previous Tribunal decisions on similar goods, opting to follow specific cases that addressed the classification of the goods in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 12:55:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 199 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74831</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the imported goods were correctly classified under Item 68 CET. The decision granted relief to the appellants, emphasizing that the dispute concerned the levy of additional duty rather than classification under the Customs Tariff Schedule. The Tribunal disregarded the relevance of previous Tribunal decisions on similar goods, opting to follow specific cases that addressed the classification of the goods in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>