<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (5) TMI 182 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74796</link>
    <description>Under the Central Excise scheme, manufacture is the taxable event, but assessment and collection depend on the rate in force on the date of removal. Goods that were exempt when manufactured do not stop being excisable merely because of that exemption, so duty becomes payable if they are removed after the levy applies. Applying Rule 9A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, the Tribunal treated the pre-budget stock as liable to duty at the removal rate and rejected duty-free clearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:05:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (5) TMI 182 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74796</link>
      <description>Under the Central Excise scheme, manufacture is the taxable event, but assessment and collection depend on the rate in force on the date of removal. Goods that were exempt when manufactured do not stop being excisable merely because of that exemption, so duty becomes payable if they are removed after the levy applies. Applying Rule 9A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, the Tribunal treated the pre-budget stock as liable to duty at the removal rate and rejected duty-free clearance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>