<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (4) TMI 193 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74792</link>
    <description>Customs exemption for direct imports by a non-commercial research institution was unavailable because the R&amp;D Unit, although recognised as a research institution without needing separate legal status, received reimbursement of its R&amp;D expenses and was therefore engaged in commercial activity. The imported articles were also entered in the name of the corporate entity rather than the R&amp;D Unit; the required Bills of Entry and invoices did not identify the R&amp;D Unit as importer. As both non-commercial status and direct importation by the research institution were conditions of the exemption, the notification&#039;s benefit was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 10:29:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (4) TMI 193 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74792</link>
      <description>Customs exemption for direct imports by a non-commercial research institution was unavailable because the R&amp;D Unit, although recognised as a research institution without needing separate legal status, received reimbursement of its R&amp;D expenses and was therefore engaged in commercial activity. The imported articles were also entered in the name of the corporate entity rather than the R&amp;D Unit; the required Bills of Entry and invoices did not identify the R&amp;D Unit as importer. As both non-commercial status and direct importation by the research institution were conditions of the exemption, the notification&#039;s benefit was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>