<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (1) TMI 234 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74776</link>
    <description>Where an appeal is filed after the ordinary limitation period but within the condonable period, the appellate authority must consider the explanation for delay and exercise discretion on relevant grounds before rejecting it as time-barred. A mechanical dismissal without first examining sufficient cause is bad in law. The text also notes that the RT-12 endorsement was cryptic and not a speaking order, and that MODVAT credit disallowance was indicated as a matter for the Assistant Collector rather than the Range Superintendent, but the dispositive point remained the need for proper appellate consideration of delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:31:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (1) TMI 234 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74776</link>
      <description>Where an appeal is filed after the ordinary limitation period but within the condonable period, the appellate authority must consider the explanation for delay and exercise discretion on relevant grounds before rejecting it as time-barred. A mechanical dismissal without first examining sufficient cause is bad in law. The text also notes that the RT-12 endorsement was cryptic and not a speaking order, and that MODVAT credit disallowance was indicated as a matter for the Assistant Collector rather than the Range Superintendent, but the dispositive point remained the need for proper appellate consideration of delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>