<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 351 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74744</link>
    <description>Coated surgical pink cloth used to make bandage dressings was not classifiable as adhesive tapes under Item 60 of the Central Excise Tariff. The Tribunal treated the entry as confined to non-medical adhesive tapes and relied on its earlier view that medicated tapes, plasters and bandages fall outside its scope. It also used the Finance Minister&#039;s budget speech as a contemporaneous aid to confirm that medical or medicated tapes were not intended to be covered. The excise demand was therefore unsustainable and the departmental appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:19:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 351 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74744</link>
      <description>Coated surgical pink cloth used to make bandage dressings was not classifiable as adhesive tapes under Item 60 of the Central Excise Tariff. The Tribunal treated the entry as confined to non-medical adhesive tapes and relied on its earlier view that medicated tapes, plasters and bandages fall outside its scope. It also used the Finance Minister&#039;s budget speech as a contemporaneous aid to confirm that medical or medicated tapes were not intended to be covered. The excise demand was therefore unsustainable and the departmental appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>