<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (10) TMI 284 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74726</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the original classification of the imported paper under heading No. 48.01/21(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument for classification under heading No. 48.01/21(3) as &quot;other printing and writing paper&quot; for heat transfer printing. The tribunal emphasized the unique properties of the paper for heat transfer printing onto synthetic fabrics, considering the specialized nature of the printing process and distinguishing it from ordinary printing or commercial use. The absence of international recognition as printing paper and similarities to heat transfer papers led to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:51:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (10) TMI 284 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74726</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the original classification of the imported paper under heading No. 48.01/21(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument for classification under heading No. 48.01/21(3) as &quot;other printing and writing paper&quot; for heat transfer printing. The tribunal emphasized the unique properties of the paper for heat transfer printing onto synthetic fabrics, considering the specialized nature of the printing process and distinguishing it from ordinary printing or commercial use. The absence of international recognition as printing paper and similarities to heat transfer papers led to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>