https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74722 Imported glass mirrors were treated as classifiable under Item 68 of the First Schedule, not Item 23(1), because the governing Supreme Court ruling on glass mirrors applied to imports after 1-3-1979. On that basis, the additional duty of customs had to follow the Item 68 classification. The supplementary appeal fee was also held refundable because the appellate record showed one composite appeal disposed of by a single order, despite six underlying orders; fees could not be levied on the mistaken assumption that separate appeals had been filed. en-us Tue, 18 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:41:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74722 Imported glass mirrors were treated as classifiable under Item 68 of the First Schedule, not Item 23(1), because the governing Supreme Court ruling on glass mirrors applied to imports after 1-3-1979. On that basis, the additional duty of customs had to follow the Item 68 classification. The supplementary appeal fee was also held refundable because the appellate record showed one composite appeal disposed of by a single order, despite six underlying orders; fees could not be levied on the mistaken assumption that separate appeals had been filed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 18 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74722