<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (7) TMI 446 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74718</link>
    <description>An exemption under Notification No. 206/76-Cus was available for a chemical shown by certificate and departmental material to be used in the manufacture of ammunition. The notification was construed as requiring use in ammunition, not exclusive use in ammunition, so the existence of another possible use did not by itself defeat the exemption. On that basis, the exemption was treated as admissible and the refund claim was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:32:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (7) TMI 446 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74718</link>
      <description>An exemption under Notification No. 206/76-Cus was available for a chemical shown by certificate and departmental material to be used in the manufacture of ammunition. The notification was construed as requiring use in ammunition, not exclusive use in ammunition, so the existence of another possible use did not by itself defeat the exemption. On that basis, the exemption was treated as admissible and the refund claim was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>