<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (7) TMI 445 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74717</link>
    <description>Moulded lens blanks imported into India were held liable to additional duty of customs corresponding to the excise duty under Item 23A(4) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The Tribunal followed its earlier order on the same classification issue and noted that no separate relief was sought under Notification No. 222/79. On that basis, the import attracted additional customs duty and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:30:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (7) TMI 445 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74717</link>
      <description>Moulded lens blanks imported into India were held liable to additional duty of customs corresponding to the excise duty under Item 23A(4) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The Tribunal followed its earlier order on the same classification issue and noted that no separate relief was sought under Notification No. 222/79. On that basis, the import attracted additional customs duty and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>