<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (11) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74669</link>
    <description>Imported semi-finished connecting rod forgings were treated as identical to goods covered in an earlier Tribunal decision, and the same classification approach was followed because the description and other material details showed no reason to depart from that view. On that basis, the goods were classified under Tariff Item 76.08/16 as articles of aluminium, and consequential relief followed from that classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:47:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (11) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74669</link>
      <description>Imported semi-finished connecting rod forgings were treated as identical to goods covered in an earlier Tribunal decision, and the same classification approach was followed because the description and other material details showed no reason to depart from that view. On that basis, the goods were classified under Tariff Item 76.08/16 as articles of aluminium, and consequential relief followed from that classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>