https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74666 Refund of additional duty was upheld where the same goods and same issue had already been covered by an earlier Tribunal decision, and the departmental representative accepted that the prior ruling applied. Although the Tribunal noted that the earlier decision depended on its own facts and that further factual inquiry might ordinarily have been desirable, it followed the coordinate decision without reopening the matter in depth. Relief was granted on the basis of Notification No. 55/75 and the prior decision, with the impugned order set aside and consequential relief allowed. en-us Wed, 13 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:39:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74666 Refund of additional duty was upheld where the same goods and same issue had already been covered by an earlier Tribunal decision, and the departmental representative accepted that the prior ruling applied. Although the Tribunal noted that the earlier decision depended on its own facts and that further factual inquiry might ordinarily have been desirable, it followed the coordinate decision without reopening the matter in depth. Relief was granted on the basis of Notification No. 55/75 and the prior decision, with the impugned order set aside and consequential relief allowed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 13 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74666