<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (7) TMI 299 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74660</link>
    <description>Imported Dutrex RT was examined for additional duty classification, with the first ground on liability to additional duty not pressed. On the surviving issue, the Tribunal followed its earlier decisions on the same product and held that the goods fell under Item 10 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The rival classification under Tariff Item 11A was rejected, and the assessee&#039;s classification prevailed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:27:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (7) TMI 299 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74660</link>
      <description>Imported Dutrex RT was examined for additional duty classification, with the first ground on liability to additional duty not pressed. On the surviving issue, the Tribunal followed its earlier decisions on the same product and held that the goods fell under Item 10 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The rival classification under Tariff Item 11A was rejected, and the assessee&#039;s classification prevailed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>