<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (6) TMI 219 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74658</link>
    <description>The Tribunal applied the binding Five Member Bench ruling that the limitation for a review notice under section 11A of the Central Excises &amp; Salt Act, 1944 ran from 1-7-1978, when the relevant amendment came into force. On that basis, the review notice dated 10-11-1980 was issued after the prescribed six-month period and was therefore barred by limitation. The objection of the respondent succeeded, and the challenged review proceedings could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:21:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (6) TMI 219 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74658</link>
      <description>The Tribunal applied the binding Five Member Bench ruling that the limitation for a review notice under section 11A of the Central Excises &amp; Salt Act, 1944 ran from 1-7-1978, when the relevant amendment came into force. On that basis, the review notice dated 10-11-1980 was issued after the prescribed six-month period and was therefore barred by limitation. The objection of the respondent succeeded, and the challenged review proceedings could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>